Review – Raven Stratagem by Yoon Ha Lee

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

I can’t point to anything specific that would explain why Raven Stratagem, and the book before it in the Machinieries of Empire series, Ninefox Gambit, grates on me.  But they do, enough that the only reason I finished the first and picked up the second at all, was because I wanted to have read, and be able to have an opinion on, all of the Hugo finalists this year.

It isn’t the writing or the world-building.  Both are good, and the world-building is actually fascinating.  The world of the Hexarchate is filled with fascinating people, communities and concepts.  The characters are interesting and diverse, and there are several that I am becoming invested in.

It may be the “calendric orthodoxy/heresy” that gets on my nerves.  Although this is primarily a science fiction space opera, there is an element of fantasy/magic in the orthodoxy that allows “exotics”, like faster-than-light travel, to exist and be used.  The concept does annoy me.

Otherwise, Lee does a terrific job with the hard science fiction tropes he uses.

Lee, Yoon Ha.  Raven Stratagem.  Oxford, England: Solaris Books, 2017.  Kindle edition.  Amazon.

Review – Provenance by Ann Leckie

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

Judging by how much I enjoyed this novel, I must have been in a terrible mood when I tried and rejected Ancillary Justice, the first novel in this universe.  I’m looking forward to reading it now.

Provenance is one of the Hugo Award finalists for the Best Novel of 2017.  It’s the story of a young woman who sees herself as unexceptional, is trying to get her mother’s approval and attention, and to show up her foster brother.  She decides on an audacious, expensive plan.  The novel follows her through the plan, its consequences, and its ramifications.

I enjoyed this novel for two main reasons.  First, the world in which the story is set is rich and complex, set in a universe with multiple planets, races, and cultures.  Fortunately, the story is understandable and enjoyable without the previous books set in the same universe.

The other reason I enjoyed the novel is that the characters are complex and unpredictable.  While reading through the setup, I expected certain things to happen.  Some of them did, some of them didn’t, and what the expected events didn’t necessarily happen for the reason that I expected.

Provenance was a delightful novel that I recommend to anyone looking for a good science fiction story.  Leckie’s prior books are now going on my list of books to read.

Leckie, Ann.  Provenance.  New York: Orbit Books, 2017.  Kindle edition.  Amazon.

Review – New York 2140 by Kim Stanley Robinson

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

Of all of the Hugo and Nebula award finalists for 2018, New York 2140 is the longest.  However, it is a comparatively quick read, so don’t let that stop you.  It’s an entertaining read, with only one, although large, problem, and it definitely belongs on this list.

The novel is set in New York City in the year 2140 and the action takes place over the next 3 years.  Most of the action, there are a couple of scenes that do take place outside of New York.  In this future, several events happened that caused ice melting and the sea to rise fifty feet.  That leaves a good portion of New York City, including all of Downton, underwater.  Since many of the buildings are skyscrapers, or at least taller than the sea rise, people still live there.  New York City is still the place to live.

There is a group of characters who live in one of the buildings in Madison Square, including the building manager, a police detective, a social worker, a couple of people in the finance industry, a cloud star who’s clothes are likely to disappear, and a couple of boys who don’t, technically, live there, in addition to several others.

Before I go into what I liked about the book, my major complaint is that there are multiple chapters which is just the author explaining the economics of the situation and why it’s a bad thing.  I found this especially annoying because his characters also explain the economic situation (economics and finance are very important to the story), and I don’t need the author jumping in a giving me a lecture.  In fact, they spend enough time giving info-dumps on both the economics (with many examples including the 2008 disaster) that I resented the author jumping in and doing it again.  The length of this book could have been cut by quite a bit, without damaging or confusing the story, just by cutting out these chapters.

That said, I did enjoy the novel.  I’ve been a fan of science fiction for decades, and enjoy a good “hard” science fiction novel.  This one falls into that category, although that does depend on whether or not you believe the scientists on climate change.  I would expect there to have been more change than there is but, otherwise, it’s a very believable future.

New York City is as much a character as any of the human characters in the novel.  Several of the characters discuss snippets of its history, especially about the Revolutionary War and the HMS Hussar, which I looked up and is a real thing.  These discussions are usually brief, or necessary to the plot, or both.

That New York City is set as the location is appropriate since it is currently the center of the financial world (in the future, not so much, but it still has much influence), plus its geographical features (it is described as an archipelago in an estuary debouching into a bight, featuring a lot of very tall buildings) make it an appropriate location.

All of this makes the novel sound grim, but it’s not.  Although there are some tense moments, a lot of less than happy ones, and not a lot of humor, there is some light-heartedness through the story.  The one financial guy’s response to being asked to look after the two boys and the cloud (internet) star and her frequent ditziness are two examples.  Frankly, the novel is a good cross-section of people that way: some dour, some cheerful, some honest but not always, some sleezy but not always.  There are no purely good people, there are no purely evil people, there are just people doing the best they can.  Which is a pretty good way of expressing one of the themes of the book:  people doing the best they can, as a community because we are social animals.

I recommend this book as a good read whether you’re looking for the next Hugo winner or not.  It’s good science fiction and a good story.

 

Robinson, Kim Stanley.  New York 2140.  New York: Orbit Books, 2017.  Kindle edition.  Amazon.

 

 

Review – Jade City by Fonda Lee

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time
This novel is described as The Godfather with magic and kungfu, which is an accurate description as far as I know.  It is set in an Asia-flavored city.  Since neither The Godfather nor Asian-flavored backgrounds really appeal to me, it doesn’t surprise me that this novel doesn’t either.
The basic story is that the families who control jade, which powers magic, also control the city.  The more jade a person wears, the more power they have.  In addition, there is a new drug, Shine, that allows magically weaker people to use more jade, with all of the advantages and disadvantages of any performance-enhancing drug.

Superficially, this novel about power, all kinds of power, what people will do to get, what they will do to keep it, and the ramifications of the above.  In reality, it is about family and loyalty, what members of a family will do to protect each other, what they will do for those who have given their loyalty, and what they will do to those who have betrayed it.

This isn’t a novel I enjoyed, but it was compelling and well-written.  If the description appeals to you, it is well worth your time.

Lee, Fonda.  Jade City.  New York: Orbit Books, 2017.  Kindle edition.  Amazon.

Review – The Collapsing Empire by John Scalzi

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

Since the word “empire” is in the title, it shouldn’t be a surprise that The Collapsing Empire reminds me more than a bit of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series.  Not in a plagiarized way, just that both series are telling a story about an empire that is about to collapse.

In this first novel of a planned series, the setup occurs.  The emperox, a gender-neutral term for emperor/empress, has just changed.  Regular space pilots are starting to notice that there are problems with the Flow, the method used to travel “faster-than-light”.  Without the Flow, each system will be isolated and, with the exception of End, none of the human population lives on planets.  Earth was isolated from the rest of the human population centuries ago, when the Flow moved.  The Nohamapetan family is being more ruthless than usual.  And only three scientists know why.

I usually enjoy Scalzi’s standalone novels, but the ones he writes as series I find less enjoyable.  Lock In and its sequel Head On are the exception.  I’m not sure why that’s so.  The plot moved along well, I didn’t get bogged down in it, but I never really found myself caring for the characters or for what was going to happen.  The world-building isn’t especially exciting; it’s a far-flung space empire that’s lost track of Earth.  That said, the science either agrees with science as it’s currently known or is at least plausible.

All in all, it’s a perfectly acceptable science fiction novel; I’m just not sure why it was nominated for a Hugo.

Scalzi, John.  The Collapsing Empire.  New York: Tor Books, 2017.  Kindle edition.  Amazon.

Review – Autonomous by Annalee Newitz

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

On its surface, this is a story about a woman who releases a pirated copy of a productivity drug, her attempts to help those who have been hurt by the drug, the people who are helping her, and the law enforcement people who are trying to find and stop her.  On that level, it’s a decent science fiction novel.

The world in which the story is set–Earth in the mid-twenty-second century–is one in which robots are created and then, ostensibly, earn their autonomy after providing their creators with a decade of work.  In addition, people can be indentured, with technically more safeguards than the chattel slavery that was our country’s shame in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

And there are the drugs.  Just as today, the drugs of this world are patented, so that only those with enough money can afford to extend their lives, recover from infections, treat genetic ailments, enhance their performance, and get intoxicated.  There are those who try to provide those treatments for all, but they are largely blocked by the large, for-profit corporations.

Newitz has some things to say about American health care in the early twenty-first century, but that’s not really the main theme.  Her main theme is achieving autonomy, and how much of it do we truly have.  We are all the products of our upbringing, our “programming,” and the pleasures that we seek.  Do any of us have real autonomy.

This isn’t my favorite of the finalists for Best Novel, but it’s a good solid story by an author to keep an eye on.

 

Newitz, Annalee.  Autonomous.  New York: Tor Books, 2017.  Kindle edition.  Amazon.

Review – Amberlough by Lara Elena Donnelly

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

This isn’t a book that I would have picked up on my own, but I’m glad that I did.

Since this is the first of a series, the second novel is due out in May. The fact that this is a fantasy world may be more obvious in later novels, but in this one, the only indication that it is a fantasy is that the areas discussed haven’t existed in human history.

The plot follows a group of people associated with the Bumble Bee Caberet in the city of Amberlough. The plot is a spy story set in an environment much like that of pre-WWII Germany. Or maybe today. Before the election that brings the radical, homophobic One State Party, the city is accepting of, and reveling in, diverse lifestyles and identies.

Once the OSP is elected, through an election many believe to have been tampered with, the main characters, and the city as a whole, must deal with the fact that the new regime will crack down on many who were believed to be good citizens before.

Although many of the characters are unlikable, at least I found them so, Donnelly makes them engaging and compelling. There are no good guys, and even the bad guys have shades to them. It’s an interesting book; I look forward to the sequel.

Amberlough by Lara Elena Donnelly. Tor Books (Kindle Edition, February 7, 2017). Amazon

Hugo and Nebula Award Finalists

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

On February 20, 2018, the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA) released the finalists for the Nebula awards for 2017 works.  The awards will be announced at this year’s Nebula conference on May 20, 2018.  On March 31, 2018,  the World Science Fiction Society (WSFS) released the finalists for the 2018 Hugo Awards.  The awards will be presented at WorldCon 76 on August 19, 2018.  I greeted this information with delight and have been gleefully reading through the works since then.

I’ve listed the works below, with links so that you can read them.  The short stories and novelettes have links to read them online, the novellas and novels have links to where you can buy them from Amazon.

In addition, I will be posting my comments on these works.  I’m calling them reviews; however, I don’t claim that they will read like a review found in a paid magazine, newspaper or online.  I will give the basic information expected in a review, but it will be distinctly from my point of view.  I don’t claim to be able to determine the “quality” or “worthiness” of a piece; I’ll be giving my purely personal comments.  Actually, any honest reviewer will admit that they do the same.

Once everything is posted, I’ll put up a separate post to link all the reviews together.  Finally, I’ll post the winners of the two sets of awards once I know them.

Enjoy your reading!

Best Novel

Best Novella

Best Novelette

Best Short Story

Why I’m doing this

Posted on by Taking One Step at a Time

To begin with, this blog will be my personal view on U.S. politics as I see them.  That means that they will be from the point of view of a 53-year-old woman, married 29 years, mother of a 21-year-old son, and registered Democrat since I turned 18.  I try to live my life as best as I can, by the virtues that Jesus taught, primarily those of compassion and mercy.

For most of my life, although I’ve had political opinions and have voted regularly, politics was something that happened “in the background”.  I’m not fond of unnecessary confrontation, which seems to be the default in politics.  I voted Democrat, discussed it with my husband and close friends, but mostly, I left it alone.

The 2016 U.S. Presidential election has been especially ugly and left me feeling especially disgusted.  I voted for Senator Sanders in the primary election but, when Secretary Clinton won the primary, I knew I would be voting for her.  Mr. Trump was not an option and, as the campaign continued, he became less so in my mind.  When November 8 came, I altered my usual Election Day schedule.  I went to the polls, with my son, before I went to work (usually I go after).  We discussed the procedure, I reminded him to make sure he’d pushed the correct buttons, we voted, I dropped him back home and I went to work.  

By the time I returned home, my husband had left on a business trip, so I watched the election returns alone.  Usually, I wouldn’t bother, but I needed to know that night.  The results weren’t “final” that night, but by the time I went to bed at 1:30am, it was pretty certain that Donald J. Trump had been elected as our 45th President.  At this point, I felt sick, and then I got angry.  This blog is one of several results of that anger.

This isn’t sour grapes.  Since 1953, which includes my entire lifetime, the Presidency has been in the hands of one party for no more than 12 years at a time.  I will even admit that the fact that the Presidency switches hands is probably good for the country as a whole, since power is not consolidated with one political party to the exclusion of the other.  I am not overjoyed at some of the decisions and actions that have been taken, especially by the Republican Presidents, but time generally balances out the good and the bad.  My issue is not that the Republican nominee in general won the election, because this has happened in four of the eight Presidential elections in which I have voted.  

My issue is entirely with Mr. Trump.  In my opinion, he is not of presidential caliber because he respects nothing and nobody other than himself.  He shows no respect for the people of the United States and he shows little to no respect for the office for which he has been elected.  His behavior since his election indicates a man who will drag this country through one scandal after another until he is impeached.  What he will do after that is anyone’s guess.

Instead of working to bring the people of this country together, which this country desperately needs, Donald Trump’s rhetoric acts to divide them.  That rhetoric is misogynistic, racist, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-everyone else who isn’t a wealthy, white male born in this country.  This rhetoric has granted tacit permission to his supporters to act on these beliefs, both in word and in deed.  From November 8, when Mr. Trump was elected, until the day I’m writing this, November 29, there have been 867 incidents of hateful speech, harassment and intimidation.  In the immediate past, this behavior was not generally condoned.  Now, however, it is understood that it is acceptable.  On a 60 Minutes interview on November 13, Mr. Trump did say to those supporters who were responsible for the hate speech to “Stop it,” but it’s not much in the way of saying that he actually disapproves.  I can’t remember hearing that he has said or done anything else to express his disapproval of the hatred currently rampant in this country.

I don’t believe that the majority of those who voted for Mr. Trump in the past election chose him because his hateful rhetoric, nor do I believe that they are racist, misogynistic or otherwise bigoted.  I know that many people voted for him because they always vote Republican or because they refused to vote for Secretary Clinton.  That is their right.  However, they will have to accept the responsibility for those votes and for the increase in racist, misogynistic and bigoted speech and actions that will occur.

I will end the topic of Mr. Trump’s respect, or lack thereof, for the people of the United States with the following quote from a campaign rally held on January 23, 2016.  “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.”  Frankly, I think better of the American people.

Donald J. Trump has also shown little to no respect for the office he intends to accept on January 20, 2017.  He shows this primarily in his refusal to separate his business and political activities.  Mr. Trump is a wealthy man with a valuable “brand” and a large corporate empire.  There have already been instances of questionable actions he has taken in regards to possibly allowing his business interests to color his political ones.  There have been cases in which diplomatic and corporate groups have decided on his hotels; some may just be looking for a “big name” place to stay, but some have stated, point-blank, that they are doing so as an “easy way” to ingratiate themselves.  Although, at this point, it is impossible to say if he has any intention of doing so, he is giving the appearance of using the office of President to enrich his own pockets.

There are also traditions associated with the Presidency that Mr. Trump appears ready to discard.  Some of them may not matter, but others certainly do.  As an example, there is some question as to whether Mr. Trump will be living in the White House once he takes office.  If he decides not to, and I hope he listens to those advisors who recommends that he does, he will be the first President since John Adams, our second President, who hasn’t lived there.  Forgetting about the fact that living elsewhere will cost more, in housing the Secret Service who protect him, in transporting him from New York City, where he currently lives, to Washington, D.C., and the inevitable traffic snarls from having the President commuting through New York City, there are also practical reasons to have the President in the White House.

Finally, Mr. Trump has expressed a great deal of respect for President Vladimir Putin of Russia.  Although we are technically at peace with Russia right now, it is a very tense peace.  Mr. Trump’s respect for President Putin, and the fact that many of the Wikileaks and other “fake” news stories originated in Russia, lead the concern that Russia wants Mr. Trump in office for its own reasons.  Those reasons are not likely to be beneficial to the United States.

In regards to the recounts, Mr. Trump has said that, “the people have spoken.”  And this is the truth; the votes that were made on November 8 are the ones that will count.  However, since the popular vote has been so overwhelmingly in favor of Secretary Clinton, and several of the “battleground” states have such slim leads, a recount seems like a sensible way to put questions to rest.  The recounts are not an accusation that Mr. Trump, or his campaign, have done anything wrong.  It is an acknowledgement that people and machines aren’t perfect, that mistakes could be made, and a check isn’t a bad idea.  Since Mr. Trump had so little respect for the election process that he refused to state that he would accept the outcome unless it went in his favor, I see no reason not to check those areas in which the leads are slim and could be mistaken.